The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
i can see why systolic blood pressure would not be the same as occlusive pressure is it a reasonable proxy um not always it really depends upon if the size of the cuff that you're using is very similar in size then you could you could do that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think the average gym goer i think one of the things that you could do is you know apply the wrap as a percentage of your resting limb size so there's some data that's done that's used that
Some would argue that the wider the cuff is you might actually attenuate some of the growth beneath the cuff
at least the early studies would take a cuff and apply the same pressure to every single person independent of their blood pressure independent of blood pressure independent of limb size independent of the cuff size that you're using so all of these things are important factors