Peter Attia· MD
we have kind of two broad types is how we typically teach it we have type 1 which is more endurance based type 2 which is more force based but in reality those are probably on a continuum
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
we have kind of two broad types is how we typically teach it we have type 1 which is more endurance based type 2 which is more force based but in reality those are probably on a continuum
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, just to kind of even circle back for those who don't know, type-1 fibers are endurance-oriented fibers, they do not produce force as well as type-2 fibers but they're indefatigable, they can go on for longer periods of time, they're hard to fatigue.