The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
biomechanically there are some differences in terms of something called the Q angle right the the the angle of the hip or the femur coming down to the knee it does create a lot more valgus at the knee for for women than than uh than it does for for men.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So like the tendency for a lot of women when they jump is to land in a in a much more vgous knee state, which could put more and more stress. ... That would be something that you'd want to coach around and make them aware of because you could strengthen that. You could work on biomechanic biomechanically improving those things. You know, you put a band around their knees and have them jump that way and land that way.