The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
typically what we'll do is you'll put the Barb in the rack and so you can imagine like a squat rack and you raise the arms of the rack yep yep and you have safety pins that run horizontal perpendicular to the ground right y so instead of putting the bar on top of those y you put the bar below them and so you just lift up against the rack and nothing moves and so you can set your position
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you're going to do kettle bell dumbbell barbell RDL barbell okay barbell yep set the barbell in the squat rack put it underneath and set the height of those safety pins to whatever height feels comfortable for you and so you'll then get in there and do that RDL and you'll pull up against that bar and nothing will move
you're going to load the bar in a low position they're going to stand under a weight that is much heavier than that they could ever lift and basically push up against the bar I mean how are you doing an isometric squat for example