The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
bodybuilders um when they are undergoing muscle protein synthesis obviously based on the nature of the training stimul you're seeing more myof fibular protein synthesis in the type 2 fibers whereas endurance athletes obviously based on the nature of their training stimulus you're seeing an increase in two things mitochondrial protein synthesis and capillary density again this is occurring in the type one fiber
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and you know just as an editorial comment on top of that we want both of those things to occur right both of those things um should be the desired outcome and therefore that's why we want both types of training