The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you can maintain bone mass at the hip uh bone mineral density yes that is absolutely a win and you know don't get me wrong there were some people who probably the largest game we had at the hip in the lift Moore study was about 6% so there were some people who improved bmd but um yeah on average it's it's something that you don't always see
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you can maintain bone mass at the hip bone Minal density yes that is absolutely a win