The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because it is you know it's such a big movement you're using it's like you know multi multi-joint big muscle group so it's also going to help contribute positively to energy expenditure compared to just doing you know isolation exercises like triceps and biceps
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because it is you know it's such a big movement you're using it's like you know multi-joint uh big muscle groups so it's also going to help contribute positively to energy expenditure compared to just doing little isolation exercises like triceps and biceps in fact I rarely program arms for women anymore because at the point where and again it depends on their goals you know if they're a kayaker or something they need arm strength I'm going to probably do that but for aesthetic reasons alone most women once we get rid of the body fat they've got great arms because just by way of the you know muscle engagement during these big compound lifts