The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the relationship between both intensity and volume of how much you do work in the gym especially volume is curvalinear and hyperbolic so it looks like this and if people are just listening to this it means if you do one all out hard set per muscle group per week which is not what Dorian did he did roughly 14 of those per week per muscle group um you get maybe something like 30% of what you could have gotten with five sets
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the relationship between both intensity and volume of how much you do work in the gym especially volume is curve linear and hyperbolic so it looks like this and if people are just listening to this it means if you do one allout hard set per muscle group per week which is not what Dorian did he did roughly 14 of those per week per muscle group um you get maybe something like 30% of what you could have gotten with five sets
volume has been shown to be a driver of hypertrophy. Again, we've done original research on this, we've made an app, made analytic work, and there is a dose-response relationship up to a certain point. It is individual-specific as well.