The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a wall sit for example you know can you do a wall sit for 2 minutes so you're sitting with your back against the wall your thighs are parallel to the ground you're not using your hands and basically this is a you know one way to test uh leg strength
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I want to say 2 minutes is considered a pretty good walls for anybody