The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one that there's a huge specificity component meaning that if you want to be a very good squatter or a very good deadlifter and being very good squatter or being a very good deadlifter means you're able to lift as heavy as possible one time then that means you should be training at least a good portion of the time at or close to that 1rm
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
meaning that if you want to be a very good squatter or a very good deadlifter and being very good squatter or being a very good deadlifter means you're able to lift as heavy as possible one time then that means you should be training at least a good portion of the time at or close to that 1 RM