Peter Attia· MD
i think at least in my opinion you cannot infer growth off a change in amg
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
i think at least in my opinion you cannot infer growth off a change in amg
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the one that's commonly cited is Mor and D or D and they had five individuals one arm um lifted weights the other arm did not lift weights and they were basically inferring muscle growth off changes in service EMG so they did measure arm circumference but that wasn't the that wasn't the variable they were using the quantify growth they were looking at changes in the slope of this integrated EMG so if they saw a change in the slope they they they inferred that to mean muscle growth if they didn't see a change in that slope then they said that was neural
and I I think one of the the points that we're always trying to make is that guarantees that at some point hypertrophy is going to be a mechanism you're not actually testing a mechanism you're just assuming that at some point it will be a mechanism so um that was the same thing with iay and fukunaga which is the other the other study
I think at least in my opinion you cannot infer growth off a change in AMG