The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but if they can't squat but they can go into a deep Squat and I would argue Peter most people can most people as soon as they hold on to something they go down into this beautiful Squat and that's when you're saying to yourself there is a neurological inhibition here this person is screaming for stability and that's when we're wasting a bunch of time going I want you to stretch your calves for the next 30 years and you're not going to see anything that's not what they need
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.