The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
whatever reason there's not a lot of literature on strength training and cancer prevention you you can find uh studies on you know strength training and cancer-related mortality but with prevention I really um it's it's sort of focused on for whatever reason on aerobic exercise
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so the study is looking at cancer prevention really seem to focus on a specific type of exercise and that is aerobic exercise for whatever reason there's not a lot of literature on strength training and cancer prevention