The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the controls are having the floor dropped from underneath them so that gap between what you would be doing and what you're doing is widening even if you're not getting better so the fact that you're even getting better slightly is mind-boggling but even if you don't the the gap between where you are and where you would be is enormous
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the controls are having the floor dropped from underneath them so that gap between what you would be doing and what you're doing is widening even if you're not getting better
if you can maintain bone mass at the hip bone Minal density yes that is absolutely a win