Peter Attia· MD
it demonstrates that lifting doesn't increase mtor to the point of it being detrimental to your health that can be asserted I think from that observation or that it's tissue also tissue specific
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
it demonstrates that lifting doesn't increase mtor to the point of it being detrimental to your health that can be asserted I think from that observation or that it's tissue also tissue specific
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you want to talk about amplitude of response from mtor resistance training dwarfs what protein does if we look at the metaanalyses on cancer incidents amongst resistance trainers and there's getting to be some now we see lower levels of cancer in people who resistance train
it demonstrates that lifting doesn't increase mtor to the point of it being detrimental to your health
if we look at the meta-analyses on cancer incidents amongst resistance trainers and there's getting to be some now we see lower levels of cancer in people who resistance train
if we look at the metaanalyses on cancer incidents amongst resistance trainers and there's getting to be some now we see lower levels of cancer and people who resistance train so what that tells me is there's a difference between these two signals