The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So, multi-joint meaning like squats, movements that are utilizing more than one joint, multi-joint is more than one joint, so, rather than a curl, you can get better effects overall on bone because of the loading that is imposed.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, again, I'm a fan of any type of resistance training over not but if you're looking to maximize bone development, I would certainly say you want to include some multi-joint movements.
the multi-joint exercises these are the the compound type of exercises they're engaging multiple muscle groups and Joints simultaneously really are the best type of exercise for improving strength and um ultimately they're more time efficient as well
they're also going to improve bone bone density more because you're putting more force and um you're putting more of the force and stressing your your your bones more with those types of exercises and that causes the adaptation of bone remodeling so you're going to have improvements in bone mineral density and and bone mass as well
engage in in resistance training and not and not the single joint exercises where you're making your biceps bigger right I mean like you need to you need to be doing these multi-joint compound lips rows you know presses anything that's multi-joint