Peter Attia· MD
the correlation or association between strength and size is equally strong in the untrained as it is the trained correct
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
the correlation or association between strength and size is equally strong in the untrained as it is the trained correct
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if you were to get a bunch of people together so and we measured muscle size and we measured strength on average people who are bigger will be stronger people who are smaller will be weaker and that that's that's true and we've seen that we've documented that ourselves
now as you continue on with your training career and you get stronger and stronger and stronger then the link between muscle size and strength does start to go away but it never goes away entirely
so the question that's being asked by or or the question that we're discussing is when a person begins to exercise and then they get stronger is that due to changes in muscle size and that's where I have the the question I I don't question whether or not they're related I completely agree that they are um but when we exercise does a change in one result in a change in the other
all things being equal if they have less muscle they'd be weaker they had more muscle they'd be stronger right