The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there was a recent study where they compared two groups of people one group did resistance training for three weeks and then would take a week off and then repeat the cycle three weeks long for one week off compared it to a group that did consistent resistance training every single week at the end of the the 16-week study what they found were very similar results
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in fact there was a recent study where they compared two groups of people one group did resistance training for three weeks and then would take a week off and then repeat the cycle three weeks long for one week off compared it to a group that did uh consistent resistance training every single week at the end of the the 16-week study what they found were very similar results