The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
they um lifted 10 PBS and the and the basically the amplitude was a little bit less they would infer that that was being picked up by muscle growth that's kind of the idea uh so the amplitude they're using to assess the neurologic sign signal and over time they're saying if the neurologic signal is going down and the and the effort is the same hypertrophy makes up the difference
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.