The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
a more hydrated cell is more able to calculate more able to carry out its function right so it's a function of a myofibril is contractile release contract release and it has more water you it sort of seems logical to me that it's going to be better at clearing metabolic waste and recruiting fuel which should at least be two things that would factor into its its ability to do that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so I think regardless of the mechanisms I mean it's pretty clear that this stuff works it's pretty clear it's safe I mean they've done numerous randomized control trials some of them being well over a year long yes you get an increase in creatinine which can be a marker of renal function