The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
interestingly colostrum is actually on the banned substances list for ncaa athletics a lot of times because it contains igf-1 so if you tolerate dairy i would see this as a positive thing i don't see igf-1 as a bad thing i see it as a hormone a growth factor that is going to be very pro-anabolic in humans
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.