We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the literature the large body of literature would suggest that mass doesn't matter which doesn't make any cognitive sense the idea that skeletal Mass doesn't matter that it's all strength that really it's about strength and my argument would be well we haven't been measuring it directly and what we're starting to see is as soon as we begin measuring skeletal muscle directly then yes there is a relationship between skeletal muscle mass and strength
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.