We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the majority of those that that do find that effect if you look at the methods what they're doing is the low load bfr group is doing the one rm every two weeks or every three weeks and they're doing it in an effect to try and reset the load so they can assume that they're progressing but what they end up doing is practicing lifting a heavy weight so you're not actually studying low lows of bfr you're studying low loads with bfr plus one rm training
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.