The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
typically I will uh incorporate you know Max you know two large compound multi-joint uh exercises typically they are the first you know six to eight sets are your best sets they are like working sets and then what we tend to see is that any volume that's accured you know after those eight first working sets tend to you start to have like diminishing returns
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
typically I will — incorporate you know at Max you know two large compound multi-joint — exercises typically they are the first you know six to eight sets are your best sets they are like working sets and then what we tend to see is that any volume that's accured you know after those eight first working sets tend to you start to have like diminishing returns
typically they are like the first you know six to eight sets are your best sets there are like working sets and then what we tend to see is that any volume that's accrued you know after those eight first working sets tend to you start to have like diminishing returns