The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
RP is kind of a it's been adapted from running to lifting and it's on a scale of 1 to 10 or I guess even zero but RP 10 being you had no more reps left that was your absolute allout like 100% effort uh rp9 is you could have done one more rep rp8 one more rep so on and so forth
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
RP rating of perceived exertion how hard is it you could do this scale of 6 to 20 it's the original bork scale do it 1 to 10 you could do it one to five um whatever the top end of the scale is the hardest repetition you could ever do and you scale back so you don't NE technically need to always be at the high end of the scale there um but you can't be you know if if you're going on a scale one to five you can't be at two on this thing four is probably the Sweet Spot uh reps and Reserve is another similar idea where
so RP is kind of a it's been adapted from running to lifting and it's on a scale of one to10 or I guess even zero but rp1 being you had no more reps left that was your absolute allout like 100% effort um rp9 is you could have done one more rep rp8 one more rep so on and so forth