Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
how does bfr training at higher reps lower weight compared to non-bfr training with higher weight and presumably lower reps and and that's a much harder head-to-head to design because the the the question is like um how do you design the protocol in each because now you've broken one of the constants that have been preserved across all of these studies — and so I I think that the answer there is still unknown
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's still a question that I don't think we know the answer to which is how does bfr training at higher reps lower weight compared to non bfr training with higher weight and presumably lower reps