The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we can barely often times not even pick out differences we know volume is important we know volume weekly set number is important we can't even pick out differences in hypertrophy sometimes with different volume protocols what makes you think we're going to pick out differences in actual hypertrophy in eight weeks from protein sources where calories and total protein are equated
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.