The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I do think it's important to understand, like, certain measures, underwater weighing, like, a lot of the measures that you'll see, DEXA, underwater weighing, BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis. They are looking at not necessarily muscle mass, although there are ways to try to derive that, but when they talk about fat-free mass and lean mass, generally, depending on the measure, they're combinations of in the very least muscle and water.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.