Peter Attia· MD
so then you can go into that weakest position and do an isometric in that weak position without having to put a whole bunch of load on your body like you would need to get getting two and from it
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so then you can go into that weakest position and do an isometric in that weak position without having to put a whole bunch of load on your body like you would need to get getting two and from it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
to wrap that up then you can actually then train that so then you can go into that weakest position and do an isometric in that weak position without having to put a whole bunch of load on your body like you would need to get getting two and from it