The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
basically i would diet for two or three weeks pretty aggressively um try to lose like a pound and a half two pounds each week and then i would take one or two or three weeks and eat just at a maintenance level of calories which for me is about 32 33 3 400.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I would do fat loss Sprints for example so I would do like two or three weeks of like a pretty aggressive deficit like 750 to 1,000 calories
basically I would diet for two or three weeks pretty aggressively um try to lose like a pound and a half two pounds each week and then I would take one or two or three weeks and eat just at a maintenance level of calories which for me is about 32 33 3,400 um and that worked extremely well for me extremely well for keeping my strength