Peter Attia· MD
but i do think it would be premature to say well we've completely ruled it out i don't think that's fair to say at all
Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
but i do think it would be premature to say well we've completely ruled it out i don't think that's fair to say at all
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but there's numerous times in the literature where we have shown greater changes in muscle size but strength doesn't even change so it that leads me to believe that there could be quite a bit of disconnect with respect to muscle growth and the change in string