The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
when we think about muscle growing at least when i think about a muscle growing where it requires a muscle to be activated for a sufficient duration of time for all those signaling pathways to be turned on so from my perspective there's a lot of different ways for that to occur you know you can use really really heavy weights you know repeatedly and that will do it
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think all those are kind of doing similar things you're recruiting these more and more and more fibers activating them and signaling them to grow
and muscle activation for a sufficient duration of time is is the name of the game at least in my opinion for making a muscle grow
i think all those are kind of doing similar things you're recruiting these more and more and more fibers activating them um and signaling them to grow
muscle activation for a sufficient duration of time is is the name of the game at least in my opinion for making a muscle grow