The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there's a ton of advantage to it the advantage is you have less degrees of freedom less moving parts so if I get you in a position say in a squat and your spine looks good and everything looks good there's a very low likelihood you're going to get out of position
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
yeah there's a ton of advantage to it the advantage is you have less degrees of freedom less moving parts so if I get you in a position say in a squat and your spine looks good and everything looks good there's a very low likelihood you're going to get out of position if I ask you to do a a back squat is extraordinarily complicated