The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you're a high-ranking baboon and your worst rival sneezing a hundred yards away has seen as a major provocation you are gonna have much higher the coronoid levels than if you are highest-ranking baboon from whom that's no big deal
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if your worst rival taking a nap is as disruptive as the guy threatening you in your face you averaged about twice the cortisol levels in your bloodstream after controlling for rank as a guy who can tell the difference between the big thing in the little thing