The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what happens in the liver as it's going through that detoxification pathway there's a pathway called the nrf2 pathway it's activated now nrf2 pathway downstream is increased glutathione which is our endogenous antioxidant and that increase in our endogenous antioxidant is what may provide some hormetic effect against DNA damage
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's not the sulforaphane that directly decreases DNA damage it's the glutathione that gets made because of the so forth vein that decreases DNA damage