There is no scientific consensus that sulforaphane is a cancer therapy. — Whalespan
There is no scientific consensus that sulforaphane is a cancer therapy.
⚠ High risk
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
✕NOTSUPPORTED
⚠
High-risk intervention — consult a physician before acting.Drug-drug interactions, dose-dependence, and screening contraindications apply.
“we do know that up regulating nrf2 protects protects cells and when you think about it metastasized cancers what's happening there those cells are growing faster than the rest of the cells around them the rest of the rest of the body for that matter if you're an adult they're growing fast they're producing the products of respiration and oxidation their mitochondria are cranking away so if you support their mitochondria and enhance their ability to enhance their ability to detoxify things including including perhaps cancer drugs this may be a slippery slope we we just don't know enough”
Conflict Watch
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
“i don't think there's there is not scientific consensus that — sulforaphane is a cancer therapy or therapeutic certainly — so it will be irresponsible to suggest that”