The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So there are two prostate cancer studies...well, there are probably more. But Joshi Alumkal at OHSU did one and Bernard Cippola in France using, actually, the supplement. So Cippola's study used, where he showed a dramatic reduction in the trajectory of PSA numbers was in, used... What's it called? [Rhonda]: Prostaphane? [Jed]: Prostaphane, thank you. Yeah, the French supplement. And Alumkal's study used our homemade broccoli sprout extract.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.