The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And one of the trials that you won't see a publication on, that I'm very sad did not get to completion and did not really accrue enough patience and I hope we can find collaborators to do a trial on this, is bladder cancer prevention.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
We are actually trying to get one off the ground with dogs now. Dogs are a little different because they sort of pee when they want to. So there's probably not the same constant reservoir of sulforaphane and its metabolites in the bladder, but certainly to a degree, there will be.