The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we are building an animal-based sunscreen which will be based in animal fats in the future in the meantime if you are looking for a sunscreen consider a a sunscreen that is based in tallow and perhaps has zinc in it that would be the sunscreen that i would recommend
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
basically you only want to use a sunscreen that is a zinc based sunscreen and I would only use a sunscreen that is a Tallow based zinc sunscreen and those are rare again stay tuned I want to build it for you guys to make it easy for you to get them but there are multiple studies now about the ingredients in mainstream sunscreens being found in the plasma so the blood the poop and the Pea and that is not a good thing because these are potentially carcinogenic they have an outlawed in Europe as carcinogens and we know that these things are not good for humans potentially hormone disruptors
But we know they contain many ingredients that are endocrine disruptors absorbed through the skin, excreted in the poop and the pee.