Paul Saladino· MD
they are absorbed through your skin they circulate through your body and now they are associated with cancer in many studies there's actually many ongoing lawsuits with compounds like oxybenzones
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
they are absorbed through your skin they circulate through your body and now they are associated with cancer in many studies there's actually many ongoing lawsuits with compounds like oxybenzones
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so not a good thing we actually don't understand what these things do long term and there is concern that they are linked with cancer and endocrine disruption
mainstream sunscreens are no good there are multiple studies now about the ingredients in mainstream sunscreens being found in the plasma and that is not a good thing because these are potentially carcinogenic they have been outlawed in Europe as carcinogens and we know that these things are not good for humans potentially hormone disruptors