Peter Attia· MD
all those clinics that are out there giving nad infusions which is very popular that's always struck me as quackery and it just seems even more quackery today because none of those cells are able to take up nad
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
all those clinics that are out there giving nad infusions which is very popular that's always struck me as quackery and it just seems even more quackery today because none of those cells are able to take up nad
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So basically the the issue is phosphates. So um you know compounds with phosphates don't get into cells. Um so the biggest piece of NAD that can get into a cell is nicotenocide.