The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
do you understand the mechanism of action now again I want to be clear you don't have to answer every one of these questions in the affirmative for it to make sense um for example there are countless things that we use for we might not fully understand the mechanism of action um but we might feel confident enough on some of these other dimensions to move forward
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.