Andrew Huberman· PhD
And if you want to learn more about other behavioral tools that one can use to maintain or enhance vision, please see the episode that we did on eyesight.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And if you want to learn more about other behavioral tools that one can use to maintain or enhance vision, please see the episode that we did on eyesight.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And there is some evidence, I spoke to our chair of opthalmology, there is some evidence through quality peer-reviewed studies that supplementing with luteine can help offset some of the detrimental effects of age- related macular degeneration, but I want to emphasize but or emphasize however only for individuals with moderate to severe macular degeneration. For people that have normal vision or with a just a low degree of macular degeneration, these studies did not see a significant improvement of vision from supplementing with luteine.