The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you do this one-size-fits-all and you give say Omega threes to everybody but people with high omega-3s maybe don't need it but then they lump the results together well guess what the study's gonna be negative maybe you should have just given you a mega the people that actually needed it and that would have been your enrollment criteria then your outcome would have been different
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.