The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in this study they're looking at three studies of healthy older men and women they did spectral analysis of eeg electroencephalographic data looking at brain waves they looked the effects of dietary boron in two of the three studies when low boron intake was compared to the high boron intake there was a significant with a p value of less than .05 increase in the proportion of low frequency activity and a decrease in the proportion of higher frequency activity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
boron also appears to improve cognition i'll show you studies to support all of those things
an effect often observed in response to general malnutrition and heavy