We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Because back in the day, it was all about, oh, these free radicals are bad. These free radicals cause cancer. These free radicals cause every disease, insulin resistance and whatever. And therefore, we need to have antioxidants, lots of antioxidants as much. And the more the better, right? And now we have this billion dollar industry born of antioxidant marketing.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.