The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Turns out there's black maca, red maca, yellow maca. There are a bunch of different forms of maca, but that they can increase subjective reports of sexual desire independent of hormone systems. Meaning it does not seem at least based on the existing literature that maca increases testosterone or changes estrogen at least not on the time scales that these studies were done or with the measures that were uh performed in these studies.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.