The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but then what I'm particularly interested in is how can we mitigate the effect of an impact initially like are there supplementation and other strategies that we can do to make the the athlete who's or somebody who's at high risk of concussions more resilient to that impact and are there other things that we can do to support recovery or minimize the effects of of the impact
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
how can we mitigate the effect of an impact initially like are there supplementation and other strategies that we can do to make the the athlete who's or somebody who's a high risk of concussions more resilient to that impact um and are there other things that we can do to support recovery or minimize the effect of of the impact