The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
um and I think you know some of the the big companies you know like um Optimum has doing been doing protein for years um and and most companies are sourcing the same stuff to me I a good company is somebody that markets responsibly um but then another one you know EAS has been making stuff for years and and they make stuff that's you know very very um you know third party tested all that kind of stuff there's a bunch of good companies out there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.