The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, these binders work like let's see, you grew up in Virginia. I grew up in Kentucky. Did you ever have that lava rock as a kid in your landscaping? No. Okay. Well, I know what you're talking about. Okay. So, those lava rocks, that's basically how binders work. It's not a magnet. It's not an absorbent with a B. It's an absorbent with a D. So, it's not a sponge. People think it's like you just mop up the toxins like a sponge, but it doesn't work
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.